Hospital Safety Center
 
   
Site Regulations  
   
Home
 
Login  
About Hospital Safety Center  
Contact Us
 
Sitemap
 
Subscribe  
       Free Resources
Hospital Safety Connection
E-Newsletter

 
Important Safety Websites  
Mac's Safety Space  
       Safety Center Members
Briefings on Hospital Safety  
Special Reports  
Healthcare Security Alert  
Safety Talk  
       Platinum Members
Regulatory Compliance Database  
Risk Assessment Workstations  
 
Hazard Vulnerability Analysis
Interim Life Safety Measures
Infection Control Risk Assessment
 
Forms and Checklists Library  

 

Butter isn't the only thing you can clarify...

Okay, Elvis has left the building (picture a Joint Commission surveyor with sideburns, sunglasses and a big ‘ol belt buckle—bell-bottoms optional) and you’re the proud owner of a handful of EC RFIs.

You tried, tried, tried to negotiate a favorable result during the survey, but a couple of things would not go away. Adding insult to injury, your organization is looking at an adverse decision of conditional accreditation (CON) or even preliminary denial of accreditation (PDA) and the rest of the team is giving you the hairy eyeball because you were supposed to have everything under control—right?!?

Well, the departure of the survey team does not signal the end of things. And, importantly, if your organization is facing an adverse accreditation decision, you need to start digging yourself out of that CON or PDA hole.

The best tool for the job? The clarification process.

But don’t spend too much time moping around because the clock is ticking.

Organizations faced with an adverse decision have a mere 10 business days from your final report to submit clarifications for findings during survey. You need to carefully analyze each finding to identify any RFIs for which clarifying evidence will reverse one or more citations. But which one (or ones) do you choose?

At a recent Joint Commission Executive Briefings conference, Darlene Christianson, executive director of accreditation and certification services at the Joint, urged the audience at a minimum to perform a post-survey audit on all RFIs involving C elements of performance and submit the results as a clarification if the audit demonstrates 90% compliance or better.

What’s that? A score of 90% is all I need? Yes, my friends, you heard it right. And, to sweeten the clarification pot even more, an audit compliance percentage of 80%–89% can, in certain cases, result in a reduction from an RFI to a supplemental recommendation.

So I ask—what are you waiting for? More on this in my next posting . . .

Steve Mac.

smacarthur@greeley.com

Comments
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us
Copyright © 2009. Hospital Safety Center.